Roman Catholic Supreme Court

The highest court in the land of the United States consists of only 9 superior judges. At present, 5 of those 9 Superior Court judges are in fact, Roman Catholics. Why would this be considered an issue? This is a Christian nation founded on Christian ideals. Catholciism is not Christianity. Over 86% of Roman Catholic doctrine is extra-biblical. (Not of Christ) Contrary to modern day populat belief, this nation was not formed by people running from high taxes as most school history books now declare. Rome altered the history books almost as shamelessly as they altered the Bibles to try and cover their historic and well documented tracks. The people that formed this nation did so to escape Roman Catholic persecution. To have Catholics in the highest office of the land (not counting the presidency) is an insult to this nations founders. The Vatican was running amuck killing everyone they could that refused to bow to their false idols or burn their Bibles. So people fled to a distant land that was mostly unpopulated. There were many Native Americans here, of which some I just learned had Christian fruits, but they weren’t under Roman rule and quite friendly for the most part. So, the Christians seeking religious freedom settled and formed America just as prophecy predicted. The Vatican and American government would have us believe people risked life and limb to escape what was at that time a 0.02% tax hike! Looking at today’s, on average 40% taxation of our hard earned cash, it proves people don’t flee nations for 0.02% tax hikes. It was the threat of being burned alive, skinned alive, cut asunder, drawn and quartered, or simply buried alive by the Roman Catholic prelates that made them choose possible death of their families sailing across the ocean to a new land. America is the prophecied end result of Roman persecution of God loving Christians, not as Rome suggests in those Government printed school books. This fleeing and making a better life for themselves angered Rome of course. Not only did the Christians escape her clutches, they proved Protestantism truly was the better and blessed will of God. That fact alone caused even more people to come to America. So what was their plan from that day forward when they saw their power not only weakened but diminishing? I’ll let them share this in their very own words…

“…Bible societies… pests of this sort must be destroyed by all means.The encyclical Quanta Cura Issued by Pope Pius IX, December 6, 1866

The old Protestant culture is about at the end of its rope Why can’t we make the U.S. Catholic in legislation, Catholic in justice, aims and ideals?”Father F. X. Talbot, editor of America, official jesuit magazine for the U.S. statement in New York Globe Dec. 14, 1930

“Democracy is a michievous dream where the Catholic Church does not predominate.” –Brownson’s Review.

“There is one, and only one, sure democracy, the Catholicism of the Popes” -The Catholic World, Oct, 1937.

With that said, can anyone, or everyone guess as to why the Vatican seeks to control the Supreme Court of America today? Sure, right off one can see it is to create a Roman Catholic form or government wherein the Pope rules supreme. Still, there is the possibility their plans will be slowed unless they have the majority, or a stronger hold on the Supreme Court. Decisions regarding the final prophecied agenda of Rome’s image being fashioned in America cannot be done without a firm hold on this court. Shocking as this may seem to some, the arrogant prelates of Rome actually admitted to this as their agenda in writing, long ago…

In the book Confusion Twice Confounded, Monsignor Joseph H. Brady states that the U.S. Supreme Court is wrong in decisions regarding “seperation of Church and State.” He says: “A sound view of the Constitution in its relation to religion probably awaits a change in personnel in our highest tribunal.” –The Register, Jan. 23, 1955.
But Constitutions can be changed, and non-Catholic sects may decline to such a point that the political proscription [ban] of them may become feasible and expedient. What protection would they have against a Catholic state?”The State and the Church, pp.38,39, by Miller and Ryan, imprimatur of Cardinal Hayes.

“The Catholic Church in this nation must live on to accomplish her work, even though our Republican form of government disappears.” –The Catholic World, April, 1935, p.12. “

They [Catholics] must penetrate wherever possible in the administration of civil affairs… all Catholics should do all in their power to cause the constitution of states, and legislation to be modeled on the principles of the true Church.” –Encyclical of Leo XIII.

This is why we have seen so many Roman Catholic fruits in our government today. Besides the obvious Latin loving laws and Roman architecture of our government buildings, we now see the infamous Vatican fingerprint of torture once again rearing it’s ugly Vatican inspired head in American politics. Basic undeniable reality dictates that wherever Rome goes, her torturous fruits follow. Pagan Rome used it, The Vatican admitted they used it on March 12, 2000, Hitler used it as Rome’s leader of the Third Reich, and the Bush family, who is known to have direct supportive ties to Hitler used it at Gitmo. It is no mistake that after the Vatican gained control of American policy did we see the U.S. military sporting ancient Vatican methods of torture at Gitmo.

Under the influence of Germanic customs and concepts, torture was little used from the 9th to the 12th centuries, but with the revival of Roman law the practice was reestablished in the 12th century… In 1252 (Pope) Innocent IV sanctioned the infliction of torture by the civil authorities upon heretics, and torture came to have a recognized place in the procedure of the inquisitional courts. -New Catholic Encyclopedia, arts. “Inquisition”, “Auto-da-Fe’,” and “Massacre of St Bartholomew’s Day.”

This is also why we saw the re-instatement of the Office of Inquisition by proven Nazi collaborator Pope John Paul II. A pope everyone has been conned by the Bilderberg controlled media into believing he was a loving and holy man. He not only opened the office that saw the torturous deaths of millions, he also appointed confirmed Nazi solider Joseph Ratzinger to lead it as his rotweiler. Then after John Paul II conveniently died, in an unprecedented move, the head Cardinal, Joseph Ratzinger somehow became Pope. A move I am convinced allowed him to escape prosecution regarding his hand in the now global molestation scandal.

How did this pro-Vatican love affair gain so much ground in modern day you ask? Looking past the fact their “saved while in sin” theology appears so attractive to the world, one can see Rome’s demand of all Catholics far and wide to forgo condoms and other birth control methods, assured their numbers to explode worldwide. This explosion allowed them a future guarantee of Catholics in office. Especially since all Catholic priests are employed as agents of Rome that “convince” certain gifted parishioners to seek public office in strategic areas. Why do you think they opened the borders in Bush’s day to allow for all the Mexican Catholics to flood the nation? They are already the largest minority in the nation today, soon they will double in size making them a significant voting block for Rome to get any Vatican law passed. What’s strange about all this is, is the fact the majority of Catholics today did not choose to become Catholics at all. They were simply born into it. The Catholic faith is such that is designed to trust their priests above their God without question simply because their parents did, and their parents did, and their parents did. What’s really amazing is, if the Catholics every did a family tree look-see they would no doubt find someone in their past became Catholics by denouncing Christ because they were looking at torture and death if they refused. That is the documented history of this church in a nutshell for modern day. Still, they needed a push in the political end of things as of late. So when Ronald Reagan chummed up with John Paul II, the fix was in. He not only allowed for complete Roman Catholic Jesuit control of Washington D.C., and announced same “visually” when facing the Mall at his second term inauguration, he placed an emphasis on bowing to the Vatican political desires at every step.

During the Reagan administration, President Ronald Reagan, after much pressure, appointed an ambassador to VATICAN CITY! When W. Kenneth Dan was asked why we need an ambassador in Vatican City, He replied; “It would allow the USA to influence the political decisions of the ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH!”


Religious establishment prohibited. Freedom of speech, of the press, and right to petition. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances

Some may say Vatican control of America is impossible. Yet these same scoffers were the very same ones that made that statement years ago when Rome publicized her desires for Europe…

Speaking of the time, about 500 A.D., when the Roman Empire was crumbling to pieces:] “No, the [Catholic] Church will not descend into the tomb. It will survive the Empire . . . At length a second empire will arise, and of this empire the Pope will be the master–more then this, he will be the master of Europe. He will dictate his orders to kings who will obey them”–Andrea Lagarde, The Latin Church in the Middle Ages, 1915, p. vi.

The scoffers were proven graphically wrong back then, and they are obviously wrong today! Seriously, look at Europe now. They are not only under complete Vatican control, wherein each leader bowed to the Pope and adopted Vatican policy, they changed their Constitution to boot! And now, Obama wants to place yet another Roman Catholic on the Supreme Court bench giving an overwhelming majority vote to the Vatican on a silver platter?

“Judge Sonia Sotomayor has much to distinguish her, but one element of her biography stands out in the world of those interested in religion and the public square: she is Catholic, and, if approved as a Supreme Court justice, she will be the sixth Catholic on the nine-member court.”

Ok, I agree, one more Catholic on the Supreme court won’t make that much of a difference. With 5 out of 9 now, they already have the majority, and Rome will keep moving forward as planned. But if Sotomayor is seated, her Vatican inspired “values” would naturally become part of the mix. Sad fact is, the woman is not only a Roman Catholic. Evidence has already been unearthed that she is a racist. If this turns out to be true, and she is placed on that bench, we can expect all sorts of pro-Catholic merry making in D.C.

Seeing how we have all been educated out of sheer media repetition that all politicians are in it for the money, and if you have enough cash to grease their palms, any law, no matter how unjust it may seem will be passed. Now do you see why so many “leaders” around the world have been “converting” to Roman Catholicism lately? The writing’s on the wall. Rome is about to take her prophecied place on the top of the heap and they want a piece of that global pie like Herod did in his day!


5 thoughts on “Roman Catholic Supreme Court

  1. You are an idiot. Where did the bible come from … or that is right … Catholics! The Bible is a Catholic document, compiled by St. Jerome and was debated by CATHOLIC BISHOPS at a CATHOLIC BISHOPS COUNCIL and promulgated by the pope. Of course if the Catholic bishops and pope did not get the Bible wrong did they… after all your denomination says they believe in the Bible alone. Jesus did not give us the Bible. He left a us a Church to guard the deposit of faith and teach infallibly. The Bible is a document of this church… known to most as the Catholic Church. Only the catholics (notice small C here) such as the Orthodox, some Oriental and the Catholics (Coptics Unitas Roman) have this Apostolic quality. All catholics (small c) agree that all others denominations non-apostolic including Anglicans and have no tradition to the early Christians. Each recognizes the others’ Apostolic tradition. All Orthodox, Oriental and Catholics agree that the Bible is to be interprited in the light of Tradition (all agree on the early Church Fathers). The Church IS the teacher… the Bible is her product. If the Bible is to be correct the teacher has to be even more error free in her teachings. If an error is found in the teachings (ex Cathetra) then the Bible itself can be called into error.

    Suddenly there was a revolution in the 1500 and they wanted to interpret the Bible in there own way. Each had his own religion and flavor: Luther, Knox, Calvin, Cranmer, etc etc) All agreed Sola Scriptua and no one agreed with each other LOL LOL LOL LOL yet they chant bible alone bible alone. What a crock of excreta.


  2. With this move it is easier to influence their way upon the masses. While yet trying to still appeal as having Christian values.
    More like anti-christian if you ask me. We will see more of these political moves in the near future.

    “For God hath put in their hearts to fulfil his will, and to agree, and give their kingdom unto the beast, until the words of God shall be fulfilled”. Revelation 17:17


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s